perm filename ENERGY.ESS[ESS,JMC]1 blob
sn#005548 filedate 1972-01-13 generic text, type T, neo UTF8
00100 FUTURE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS - A POSITION PAPER
00200
00300 by John McCarthy
00400 Professor of Computer Science
00500 Stanford, University
00600
00700
00800 By way of self-introduction, I should say that my interest in
00900 future energy requirements is part of a general interest in
01000 technology and society about which I am writing a book. My general
01100 point of view is that humanity will benefit from the development of
01200 much more technology of kinds that will be discussed in the book. In
01300 order to discuss future technology, it is necessary to see whether
01400 the resources will exist for an even more technological society. My
01500 tentative conclusion is that the resources do exist to bring several
01600 times the world's present population to several times the present
01700 U.S. standard of living and keep them there indefinitely, but that
01800 this requires new technology based on present science.
01900
02000 With regard to the subject of the present conference, future
02100 needs for electricity, it seems to me that the studies I have been
02200 read have been inadequate. Most thinking so far is based on simple
02300 extrapolation of the average growth rate over the last few decades.
02400 If such an extrapolation had been done with U.S. per capita beef
02500 production for the decades just before 1890, we might have reached
02600 the conclusion that by 1972, each American would eat a cow a week. A
02700 more detailed approach is necessary.
02800
02900 The use of electricity is traditionally divided into the
03000 industrial, commercial, and residential sectors. All of these have
03100 been growing, but the residential sector has been growing the
03200 fastest. I have not tried to figure out how to forecast industrial
03300 and commercial demand, but the residential demand lends itself to
03400 some simple techniques for estimating when saturation will occur and
03500 what the saturation per capita demand will be for the present uses of
03600 electricity. A preliminary look shows a surprisingly simple
03700 situation, namely, the main possibilities for large future increases
03800 in demand come from increases in the use of electricity for
03900 air-conditioning and space heating. A very rough guess based on TVA
04000 figures indicates that if all housing were air-conditioned and heated
04100 electrically, the per capita residential use of electricity would be
04200 between four and five times what it is at present. It seems to me
04300 that the universal use of home air-conditioning except in a few
04400 climatically favored areas like Northern California is inevitable,
04500 barring a severe power shortage which seems to me unnecessary and
04600 unlikely. Heating will convert to electricity more slowly, but if
04700 coal, oil, and natural gas become more expensive than nuclear power,
04800 as I think they will in a few decades, the conversion to electric
04900 heat is also quite likely. Since my position on overcoming the
05000 hazards of and the objections to nuclear power is like the
05100 conventional wisdom of the nuclear power advocates, I shall not
05200 elaborate it further.
05300
05400 Whether the demand for electricity will grow beyond the
05500 saturation of present appplications depends on whether new
05600 applications will appear. This is a question which should be
05700 discussed concretely and not just by drawing lines on semi-log paper.
05800 A major application will come from the exhaustion of oil resources
05900 which we can expect in the 1990's at least for Japan and Western
06000 Europe which have fewer internal resources than the U.S.A. A
06100 solution to this problem is to make motor fuel using nuclear energy.
06200 One proposal is to use liquid hydrogen (Lawrence W. Jones, Science,
06300 22 October 1971). Another is to take CO2 from the air and water and
06400 energy and make gasoline from it. At five mills per kwh, this
06500 corresponds to a 15 cents per gallon cost for gasoline for the energy
06600 alone. Since Americans would still drive their cars if gasoline cost
06700 $1.00 per gallon, there is quite a margin to work with. When one of
06800 these conversions is made, and I see no worthwhile alternative, the
06900 demand for electricity for this purpose may be one to two times the
07000 present per capita use for all purposes.
07100
07200 While a position of sorts, it is not well enough worked out
07300 to justify crossing the country to express it. My main motivation is
07400 to observe the interaction of the various flavors of
07500 environmentalist, industrialist, academic, and politician and to try
07600 to form a personal estimate of the amount of intelligence being
07700 applied to the problem of electrical power compared to the problem of
07800 getting political power.